According to
Daniel Learner, the operational values or characteristics of Modernization are:
-
A
degree of self-sustaining growth in the economy or at least growth sufficient
to increase both production and consumption.
-
A
measure of public participation in the policy alternatives or at least
democratic representation in defining and choosing all policy level.
-
Diffusion
of secular-rational norms in culture.
-
An
increment of mobility in the society understood as personal freedom of physical,
social and psychic movement.
-
Corresponding
transformation in the modal personality.
Modernization
in most of the views, defined as the process of acquiring or imitating of the
western and European culture by the less developed countries of Asia, Africa and
Latin America. Simply this is the process of being developed in technology,
tradition, behavior, and economy with more liberalization and globalization.
This concept emerged mainly after the World War II. Due to the cold war and
polarization between former USSR (Warsaw Pact) and USA (North Atlantic Treaty
Organization).
Contexts
of Modernization:
a)
‘Poverty
is not inevitable fate’ awareness campaign.
b)
Freedom
of Colonization
c)
Cold
War
d)
Population
Explosion
Key Assumptions:
-
Culture
always transfers from developed to less developed
-
Change
in technology, economy, trends, plans and policies etc.
-
Modernization
process is based on trickle-down (Trickle-down) approach.
-
Mentality
that adopting the culture of developed societies lets development for less
developed ones.
-
Advancement
in technology, culture, tradition economy, infrastructures etc.
-
Only
way to achieve development is adoption of culture.
In Nepalese context, Modernization begins only after 2007,
then foreigners are allowed to enter into Nepalese territory freely. In 2013
Nepal adopted planning strategy in national level, planned development begins.
New education system in 2028, establishment of television 2041, political
change of 2046 and 2063.
Variants of Modernization:
Walt Whitman Rostow (1916-2003) is one of the most popular economist
for his concept of stages of economic growth. These are mentioned as below:
A)
Traditional Society:
-
Characterized
by subsistence agriculture or hunting and gathering; almost wholly a primary
sector economy.
-
Limited
technology
-
A
static or rigid society, lack of class or individual economic mobility, with
stability prioritized and change seen negatively.
B)
Pre-conditions to ‘take-off’:
-
External
demand for raw materials initiates economic change.
-
Development
of more productive, commercial agriculture and cash crops not consumed by
producers and/or largely exported.
-
Widespread
and enhanced investment in changes to the physical environment to expand
production (i.e. irrigation, canal, ports)
-
Increasing
spread of technology and advances in existing technologies.
-
Changing
social mobility begins.
-
Development
of National identity and shared economic interests.
C)
Take-off
-
Urbanization
increases, Industrialization proceeds. Technological breakthrough occurs.
-
The
‘secondary’ (goods-producing) sector expands and ratio of secondary vs. primary
sectors in the economy shifts quickly towards secondary.
-
Textiles
and Apparel are usually the first ‘take-off’ industry, as happened is Great
Britain’s classic ‘Industrial Revolution’.
D)
Drive to maturity
-
Diversification
of the industrial base; multiple industries expand and new ones take roots
quickly.
-
Manufacturing
shifts from investment driven (capital goods) towards consumer durables and
domestic consumption.
-
Rapid
development of transportation infrastructure.
-
Large-scale
investment in social infrastructure (schools, universities, hospitals etc.)
E)
Age of high mass consumption
-
The
industrial base dominates economy; the primary sector is of greatly diminished
weight in economy and society.
-
Widespread
and normative consumption of high value consumer goods (e.g. automobiles)
-
Consumers
typically (if not universally), have disposable income, beyond all basic needs,
for additional goods.
Criticisms:
1)
Rostow
is historical in the sense that the end result is known at the outset and is
derived from the historical geography of a developed, bureaucratic society.
2)
Rostow
is mechanical in the sense that the underlying motor of change is not disclosed
and therefore the stages become little more than a classificatory system based on
data from developed countries.
3)
His
model is based on American and European history and defines the American norms
of high mass consumption as integral to the economic development process of all
industrialized societies.
4)
His
model assumes the inevitable adoption of Neo liberal trade policies which
allows the manufacturing base of a given advanced polity to be relocated to
lower-wage regions.
5)
Rostow’s
model doesn’t apply to the Asian and African countries as events in these
countries are not justified in any stage of his model.
6)
The
stages aren’t identifiable properly as the conditions of take-off and pre
take-off stage are very similar and also overlap.
7)
According
to Rostow, growth becomes automatic by the time it reaches the maturity stage
but Kuznets asserts that no growth can be automatic, there is need for push
always.
8)
There
are two unrelated theories of take-off, one is that take is a sectorial and a
non-liner notion and other is that it is highly aggregative.
Comments
Post a Comment